How to use critical discourse analysis for policy analysis: a guideline for policymakers and other professionals
Palabras clave:
KMResumen
This tool aims to explain how critical discourse analysis (CDA) can be used to analyse policy texts, based on the example of ways in which we have employed CDA in recent academic papers. In these papers, using CDA has represented a process of learning by doing and we have tried to distil this process for others. We have adapted the methodology developed by Fairclough, making it more accessible for a non-specialist audience by improving the clarity of the language and describing the four phases of the methodology in more detail.
Citas
References
Brandner, A. and S. Cummings (2018) Agenda Knowledge for Development: strengthening Agenda 2030 and the Sustainable Development Goals. Vienna: Knowledge for Development Partnership, 99pp.
Briant Carant, J. (2016): Unheard voices: a critical discourse analysis of the Millennium Development Goals? evolution into the Sustainable Development Goals. Third World Quarterly, DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2016.1166944
Cummings, S.J.R., Regeer, B.J., de Haan, L.J.A., Zweekhorst, M.B.M. and Bunders, J.F.G. (2018) Critical discourse analysis of perspectives on knowledge and knowledge societies within the Sustainable Development Goals. Development Policy Review 36: 727-747.
Cummings, S.J.R., A.A. Seferiadis and L. de Haan (2019) Getting down to business? Critical discourse analysis of perspectives on the private sector in sustainable development. Sustainable Development Online first https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2026
van Dijk, T. A. (2005) Critical Discourse Analysis, in The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (eds D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen and H. E. Hamilton), Blackwell Publishers Ltd, Malden, Massachusetts, USA. doi: 10.1002/9780470753460.ch19
Fairclough, N. (2005) Critical discourse analysis in transdisciplinary research. In: A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis: Theory, methodology and interdisciplinarity. Edited by Ruth Wodak and Paul Chilton [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 13] 2005, 53-70 https://www.sfu.ca/cmns/courses/2012/801/1-Readings/Fairclough_CDA%20and%20interdisciplinary%20research.pdf (Accessed 19 June 2016)
Fairclough, N. (1995) Media discourse. London: Hodder Headline Group, 1995.
Fairclough, N. (2006). Language and Globalization. London: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203593769
Fairclough. N. (2012a) The dialectics of discourse. Unpublished paper
https://www.sfu.ca/cmns/courses/2012/801/1-readings/Fairclough%20Dialectics%20of%20Discourse%20Analysis.pdf (Accessed 11 May 2016)
Fairclough, Norman (2012b) Critical Discourse Analysis. In: The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis, edited by James Paul Gee and Michael Handford, 9-21. Abingdon and New York: Routledge, 2012.
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Abingdon: Routledge.
Freeman, R., & Maybin, J. (2011). Documents, Practices and Policy. Evidence & Policy, 7(2), 155-170. https://www.research.ed.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/documents-practices-and-policy(88450712-b952-437a-92df-c1de61136f72).html (Accessed on 17 July 2019).
Hook, D. (2001). Discourse, knowledge, materiality, history : Foucault and discourse analysis. London: LSE Research Online. Available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/archive/956
Hornidge, A.K. (2011) ?Knowledge Society? as academic concept and stage of development: a conceptual and historical review. In: Menkhoff, Thomas, Hans-Dieter Evers, Chay Yue Wah and Eng Fong Pang (eds.) Beyond the Knowledge Trap. New Jersey: World Scientific, pp. 87-128.
Jarvis, L. (2009). Times of terror : Discourse, temporality and the war on terror. Basingstoke England: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9780230243637
Langan, M. (2011) Private sector development as poverty and strategic discourse. Journal of Modern African Studies, 49: 83-113
Parker, I. (1990) Discourse: definitions and contradictions. Philosophical Psychology 3 (2 & 3): 187-204.
Potter, J. and M. Wetherell (1987) Discourse and Social Psychology: beyond attitudes and
behaviour (London, Sage).
Said, E. (1983). The world, the text and the critic. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Spangenberg, J.H. (2017) Hot air or comprehensive progress? A critical assessment of the SDGs. Sustainable Development 25: 311?321.
Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld/publication (Accessed 15 January 2019)
United Nations Millennium Declaration. New York: UN General Assembly.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2020 Sarah Cummings, Leah De Haan, Anastasia-Alithia Seferiadis
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Los derechos de autor de los artículos publicados en esta revista son propiedad de los autores. En cuanto a la responsabilidad, el título pertenece a la Fundación para el Apoyo de la Revista de Gestión del Conocimiento para el Desarrollo (Foundation for the Support of the Knowledge Management for Development Journal). La revista se publica bajo una Licencia Creative Commons (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike License). Esta es una revista de acceso abierto ya que tiene un modelo de financiación que no cobra a los lectores ni a sus instituciones por el acceso. De acuerdo a la definición BOAI [1] de "acceso abierto", apoyamos los derechos de los usuarios a "leer, descargar, copiar, distribuir, imprimir, buscar o vincular a los textos completos de estos artículos". Sin embargo, parte del contenido (2009-2012) solo está disponible en el sitio web de Taylor and Francis. En los próximos meses, todo ellos también estará disponible en el OJS.[1] http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm#openaccess
