What is integral knowledge management and why do we need it? How the spiral dynamics model can help us overcome polarized perspectives on knowledge management within organisations
Keywords:
Knowledge Management, Integral KM, Spiral Dynamics, Integral Theory, Integral, WilberAbstract
This article proposes a novel approach to knowledge management (KM) based on the Spiral Dynamics (SD) model. It posits that some of the key challenges of KM in organisations stem from the fact that different people in organisations are operating from different worldviews and subsequently different understandings of what knowledge is and how to adequately handle it. The article first identifies five worldviews in KM: The magic view (knowledge provides identity and belonging), the hero view (knowledge is power), the absolutistic view (knowledge is order and truth), the modern view (new knowledge is the driver of success) the pluralistic view (everyone’s knowledge is precious). Each worldview has its own principles, motivations, and shadow sides, and each has something to offer to support KM initiatives in different contexts. This article argues that a sixth, integral view of KM (knowledge is complex, multi-faceted and always changing) which draws on the strengths of all other worldviews can address the frictions and conflicts that often arise in organisations with diverse perspectives on KM. By embracing an integral approach, KM practitioners can create more inclusive and adaptable KM initiatives that better serve the needs of all stakeholders.
References
Beck, D., Cowan, C. (1996). Spiral Dynamics: Mastering Values, Leadership, and Change. Blackwell Publishing
Djohossou, P., S. Bulbul, A.Hendrix-Jenkins (2023). Creating spaces for knowledge decolonization: changing relationships and shifting power dynamics for co-creation across the Movement for Community-led Development. Part 2. Knowledge Management for Development Journal Online first. 19pp.
Graves, C. (1974). Human Nature Prepares for a Momentous Leap. The Futurist (1974), 72-87pp
Henderson, K. (2005). The knowledge sharing approach of the United Nations Development Programme. Knowledge Management for Development Journal 1(2). 19-30
Laloux, F. (2014). Reinventing Organisations. Nelson Parker
Lammers, J. (2009). The human factor in knowledge management for development: using theories from social psychology to investigate the predictors of knowledge behaviour in development organisations. Knowledge Management for Development Journal 5(2): 127–142.
Pollack, S., van Winkelen, C., Battersby, K., Simmonite, S., Hall, P., Forman, J., Potter, R., Ostrowski, E., Stellar, Q., Sheehan, T. and Springate, S., (2003). Towards Integral Culture Change Initiatives to Support Knowledge Management Alex Goodall (Unisys Ltd) Robert Taylor (Unisys Ltd)
SDIN (2023). Overview Value Systems. Spiral Dynamics Integral Netherlends, https://spiraldynamicsintegral.nl/en/overview-value-systems (3/22/2023)
Shahvali, M. (2019). Enriching indigenous knowledge: an alternative paradigm for empowerment, Knowledge Management for Development Journal 6(3): 194–205.
Snowden, D. (2023). The Cynefin Framework. The Cynefin Company https://thecynefin.co/about-us/about-cynefin-framework (3/23/2023)
Solnes Miltenburg, A., E. Rijkers, N. Maselle, J. Barass, J. Van Roosmalen and J.G.F. Bunders (2013). Reflections on the dynamics of the coexistence of multiple knowledge cultures in a community-based maternal health project in Tanzania. Knowledge Management for Development Journal 9 (2): 162-184
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
Wilber, K. (2000). A Theory of Everything. Shambhala
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Johannes Schunter
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in this journal remains the property of the authors. For liability reasons, the title belongs to the Foundation for the Support of the Knowledge Management for Development Journal. The journal is published under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike License. This journal is currently an open access journal as it has a funding model that does not charge readers or their institutions for access. From the BOAI definition [1] of "open access", we support the rights of users to "read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles." However, some of the content (2009-2012) is only available on the Taylor and Francis website. Within the next few months, this issue too will become available on the OJS. [1] http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm#openaccess