A conversation tool for civility and knowledge integration: ‘a conversation model that combines dialogue and (self)facilitation for civility and creativity in a fragmented world.’
Keywords:
conversation, dialogue, methods, civilty, knowledge integration, knowledge co-creation, polarization, facilitationAbstract
Conversation can be a vehicle for human flourishing, with its ability to invite expression, generate and translate ideas, and build enduring relationships. On the other hand, conversation can be filled with the rancor so prevalent in our media and civic arenas. While unconscious bias, conversation-fears and time-pressures may lead us to prefer the act of fleeing over engaging, certain ways of thinking and communicating can help us improve our conversations’ productivity and knowledge integration. This is good for the group, and for our own mental health. The Five Discussion Disciplines (5DDs), derived from the sciences of dialogue, facilitation and traditional wisdom, equip participants to converse with respect and impact. The 5DDs are also easy to learn and observe. In this article, we observe the common gaps in conversation skills and self-confidence, we describe the 5DD model for productive conversation, we illustrate conversation impacts through examples, dos and don’ts, and case studies; and we provide action strategies for individuals and leaders. We end the article with a plea for further research. Finally, we invite the reader to join a community committed to improving conversation for civility and knowledge integration.
References
Argyris, C. (1994). Good communication that blocks learning. Harvard Business Review, 72(4), 77–85.
Axelrod, R. and & Hamilton. W. (1981). The evolution of cooperation. Science, New Series, Vol. 211, No. 4489. (Mar. 27, 1981), pp. 1390-1396.
Benkler, Y. (2011). The Unselfish Gene. Harvard Business Review, July-August. Reprint: R1107E
Bohm, D. (2002). Wholeness and the Implicate Order. New York. Routledge. (First Published 1980). https://www.amazon.com/Wholeness-Implicate-Order-David-Bohm/dp/0415289793
Boyd, R. (2017). How humans became outliers in the natural world, in A Different Kind of Animal. Princeton Press.
Dixon, N. (2021). The Promise of Dialogue Transforming the Culture in a Department. The International Journal of Appreciative Inquiry, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.12781/978-1-907549-47-2
Drucker, P. F. (2008) Management, Revised Edition by Joseph A. Maglariello, Harper Collins..
Edmondson, A., & Lei, Z. (2014). Psychological Safety: The History, Renaissance, and Future of an Interpersonal Construct. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2014(1), 23-43. HTTPS://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091305
Eisenberger, N. I. (2012) "The pain of social disconnection: examining the shared neural underpinnings of physical and social pain." Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 13 (6), pp. 421-426.
Ehrlichman, D. (2021) Impact Networks, Create Connection, Spark Collaboration, and Catalyze Systemic Change, Berrett-Koehler Publishers https://www.bkconnection.com/books/title/Impact-Networks
Henrich, J. (2016). The secret of our success: How culture is driving human evolution, domesticating our species, and making us smarter, Princeton University Press. https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691178431/the-secret-of-our-success
Isaacs, W. (1999). Dialogue and the Art of Thinking Together. Princeton Press. https://www.amazon.com/Dialogue-Thinking-Together-William-Isaacs/dp/0385479999
Isaacs, W. (2016). Trim-Tab Dialogues: Transformative Vision and Action in South Asia. In The World Needs Dialogue! (Issue February, pp. 1–19).
Jackson, M. (2023). Uncertain: The Wisdom and Wonder of Being Unsure. Prometheus, 2023. ISBN-10 : 1633889181 ISBN-13 : 978-1633889187
Malik, P., Garg, P. (2017) The relationship between learning culture, inquiry and dialogue, knowledge sharing structure and affective commitment to change, Journal of Organizational Change Management (30) 4, 610-631. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JOCM-09-2016-0176/full/html
Mor Barak, M. E. (2017) Managing Diversity, Toward a Globally Inclusive Workplace, 4th Edition, Sage Publications (pp. 193-194). https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/managing-diversity/book259165
Page, E. S. (2017) The Diversity Bonus, How Great Teams Pay Off in the Knowledge Economy, Princeton University Press.
Pinker, S. Nowak, M. & Lee, J. (2008). The logic of indirect speech. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(3), 833–838.
Porath, C. (2015) The Leadership Behavior That’s Most Important to Employees in Emotional Intelligence, Harvard Business Review, May 11, 1-5.
Pugh, K. (2020, March 30). In the Digital Fray, Don’t Just Converse. Collaborate. LinkedIn. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/digital-fray-dont-just-converse-collaborate-katrina-kate-pugh
Pugh, K., (2022) Sustainability Conversations for Impact: Transdisciplinarity on Four Scales. Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 3608, Chapter 4. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd/3608/
Pugh, K., Musavi, M., Johnson, T., Burke, C., Yoeli, E., Currie, E., and Pugh, B. (2023), Neural nets for sustainability conversations: modeling discussion disciplines and their impacts. Neural Computing and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-023-08819-z
Sapolsky, R. M. (2017). Behave: the biology of humans at our best and worst. New York, New York, Penguin Press. https://www.amazon.com/Behave-Biology-Humans-Best-Worst/dp/1594205078
Scharmer, O. (2018). The Essentials of Theory U: Core Principles and Applications. Oakland, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers. ISBN-10: 1523094400
Settle-Murphy, N. & Pugh, K. (2020). Healthy Conversations Can Bring Virtual Teams Back to Life –Part 2. Guided Insights, October 19, 2020 https://www.guidedinsights.com/how-inclusion-and-integrity-foster-more-productive-conversations-reduce-bias-in-a-virtual-world/
Settle-Murphy, N. & Pugh, K. (2020). Healthy Conversations Can Bring Virtual Teams Back to Life - Part 1. Guided Insights, August 19, 2020. https://www.guidedinsights.com/healthy-conversations-can-bring-%EF%BB%BFvirtual-teams-back-to-life/
Sievers, B., Welker, C., Hasson, U., Kleinbaum, A. M., & Wheatley, T. (2020). How consensus-building conversation changes our minds and aligns our brains. https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/562z7?trk=public_post_main-feed-card-text
Sinek, Simon (2021). A Quick Way to Find your Why. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e1iQjFMiLuE Posted Mar 31, 2021 on the Simon Sinek YouTube channel. https://www.youtube.com/@SimonSinek
Skifstad, S. & Pugh, K. (2014). Beyond Netiquette: Discussion Discipline Drives Innovation (Chapter 8). In Pugh, K., Smarter Innovation: Using Interactive Processes to Drive Better Business Results (2014). Wilmington, DE: Ark Group.
Weick, K. E., & Roberts, K. H. (1993). Collective Mind in Organizations: Heedful Interrelating on Flight Decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(3), 357. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393372
Welker, C., Walker, J., Boothby, E., & Gilovich, T. (2023). Pessimistic assessments of ability in informal conversation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 53(7), 555–569. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12957
Wieand, P. (2002) "Drucker's challenge: communication and the emotional glass ceiling." Ivey Business Journal, 66 ( 5), 32-37.
Yunkaporta, T. (2019) Chapter 1 and 9 (partial) Sand Talk, How Indigenous Thinking Can Save the World, Harper One https://www.harpercollins.com/products/sand-talk-tyson-yunkaporta?variant=32280908103714
Zaki J, Mitchell JP. (2013) Intuitive Prosociality. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(6), 466-470. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44318707
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Katrina Pugh, Nara Altmann
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in this journal remains the property of the authors. For liability reasons, the title belongs to the Foundation for the Support of the Knowledge Management for Development Journal. The journal is published under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike License. This journal is currently an open access journal as it has a funding model that does not charge readers or their institutions for access. From the BOAI definition [1] of "open access", we support the rights of users to "read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles." However, some of the content (2009-2012) is only available on the Taylor and Francis website. Within the next few months, this issue too will become available on the OJS. [1] http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm#openaccess